Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Perceptions of childhood immunization in a minority community: Qualitative study
Authors: Henderson, L
Millett, C
Thorogood, N
Keywords: Childhood immunization;Vaccination;Children's health;Community networks;Minority communities
Issue Date: 2008
Publisher: Sage
Citation: Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 101(5), 244 - 251, 2008
Abstract: Objective - To assess reasons for low uptake of immunization amongst orthodox Jewish families. Design - Qualitative interviews with 25 orthodox Jewish mothers and 10 local health care workers. Setting - The orthodox Jewish community in North East London. Main outcome measures - Identification of views on immunization in the orthodox Jewish community. Results - In a community assumed to be relatively insulated from direct media influence, word of mouth is nevertheless a potent source of rumours about vaccination dangers. The origins of these may lie in media scares that contribute to anxieties about MMR. At the same time, close community cohesion leads to a sense of relative safety in relation to tuberculosis, with consequent low rates of BCG uptake. Thus low uptake of different immunizations arises from enhanced feelings of both safety and danger. Low uptake was not found to be due to the practical difficulties associated with large families, or to perceived insensitive cultural practices of health care providers. Conclusions - The views and practices of members of this community are not homogeneous and may change over time. It is important that assumptions concerning the role of religious beliefs do not act as an obstacle for providing clear messages concerning immunization, and community norms may be challenged by explicitly using its social networks to communicate more positive messages about immunization. The study provides a useful example of how social networks may reinforce or challenge misinformation about health and risk and the complex nature of decision making about children's health.
Description: This is the author's accepted manuscript. The final published article is available from the link below. Published article copyright @ The Royal Society of Medicine.
ISSN: 0141-0768
Appears in Collections:Sociology
Dept of Social Sciences Media and Communications Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf445.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.