Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Chess players' thinking revisited
Authors: Gobet, F
Keywords: Chess;Chunking;Decision making;Expertise;Pattern recognition;Thinking;Search;Verbal protocol;Problem solving;Template;Chunk;Skill;Decision making;Search models
Issue Date: 1998
Publisher: Verlag Hans Huber
Citation: Chess players' thinking revisited. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 57: 18-32, 1998
Abstract: The main result of De Groot’s ([1946] 1978) classical study of chessplayers’ thinking was that players of various levels of skill do not differ in the macrostructure of their thought process (in particular with respect to the depth of search and to the number of nodes investigated). Recently, Holding (1985, 1992) challenged these results and proposed that there are skill differences in the way players explore the problem space. The present study replicates De Groot’s (1978) problem solving experiment. Results show that Masters differ from weak players in more ways than found in the original study. Some of the differences support search models of chess thinking, and others pattern recognition models. The theoretical discussion suggests that the usual distinction between search and pattern recognition models of chess thinking is unwarranted, and proposes a way of reconciling the two approaches.
Appears in Collections:Psychology
Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1791.pdf139.95 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.