Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://buratest.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/6548
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchützwohl, A-
dc.contributor.authorReisenzein, R-
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-16T11:24:54Z-
dc.date.available2012-07-16T11:24:54Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationEvolution and Human Behavior, Accepted for publication, 2012en_US
dc.identifier.issn1090-5138-
dc.identifier.otherhttp://www.ehbonline.org/article/S1090-5138(12)00042-6/abstract-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/6548-
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.abstractAccording to the affect program theory of facial displays, the evolutionary core of the human emotion system consists of a small set of discrete emotion mechanisms that comprise motor programs for emotion-specific facial displays. However, research on surprise has found that surprising events often fail to elicit the associated facial expression (widened eyes, raised eyebrows, mouth opening). The present study tested a refined Darwinian account of the facial expression of surprise, according to which surprising events cause widened eyes and raised eyebrows if they exceed the field of vision, as these facial changes increase the visual field and facilitate visual search. To test this hypothesis, we staged a surprising event that engulfed the field of vision: When the participants left the laboratory, they unexpectedly found themselves in a new room, a small chamber with bold green walls and a red office chair. In addition, to explore the role of social context for the expression of surprise, in two of three experimental conditions, a stranger or a friend they had brought to the experiment was sitting on the chair. The results provided no support for the Darwinian account of the facial expression of surprise. A complete expression of surprise was observed in 5% of the participants, and the individual components of the expression were shown only by a minority, regardless of social context. These findings reinforce doubts about the adequacy of affect program theory for the case of surprise.en_US
dc.languageen-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Incen_US
dc.subjectSurpriseen_US
dc.subjectFacial expressionen_US
dc.subjectAffect program theoryen_US
dc.subjectEvolutionary psychologyen_US
dc.titleFacial expressions in response to a highly surprising event exceeding the field of vision: a test of Darwin's theory of surpriseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.04.003-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff/School of Social Sciences-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff/School of Social Sciences/Psychology-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Social Sciences - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Social Sciences - URCs and Groups/Centre for Culture and Evolutionary Psychology-
Appears in Collections:Publications
Psychology
Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Schuetzwohl + Reisenzein - facial expression of surprise.pdf87.12 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.