Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://buratest.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/6221
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBehague, DP-
dc.contributor.authorGonçalves, HD-
dc.contributor.authorGigante, D-
dc.contributor.authorKirkwood, BR-
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-13T12:29:20Z-
dc.date.available2012-02-13T12:29:20Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationSocial Science and Medicine, 74(3): 434 - 443, 2012en_US
dc.identifier.issn0277-9536-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953611006575en
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/6221-
dc.descriptionCopyright @ 2011 Elsevier Ltd. This is a post-print version of the article. The published version of the article can be viewed at the link below.en_US
dc.description.abstractExplanations for the association between teen-childbearing and subsequent mental morbidity vary considerably, from those based on neurological theories of development to those investigating underlying social and economic determinants. Based on longitudinal epidemiological and ethnographic sub-studies of the 1982 Pelotas birth cohort study, this paper explores the hypothesis that teen childbearing and subsequent mental morbidity have become associated through the interplay of culture, society, and biology in situations where teen pregnancy has become a stigmatised object of scientific and public health attention. Results show that the effect of teen childbearing on subsequent mental morbidity remained significant in the multivariate analysis. Ethnographic analysis, together with epidemiological effect modification analyses, suggest that this association is partially accounted for by the fact that it is more pronounced amongst a specific subgroup of women of low socio-economic status who, being more politicised about societal injustice, were also more critically engaged with – and thus troubled by – the inequitable institutionalisation of life-cycle transitions. With time, these women became highly critical of the institutionalised identification of early childbearing as a key violation of life-cycle norms and the differential class-based application of scientific knowledge on its causes and consequences. Public health campaigns should consider how the age-based institutionalisation of developmental norms has enabled the stigmatisation of those identified as transgressors.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe 1982 cohort study has been funded by The Wellcome Trust, the World Health Organisation, the PanAmerican Health Organisation, the European Union, the Programa Nacional para Centros de Excelência (PRONEX), the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), the Brazilian Ministry of Health, and the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Rio Grande do Sul (Fapergs). D Béhague received support from a US National Science Foundation Doctoral Fellowship and a Postdoctoral Training Fellowship from The Wellcome Trust (Grant no. GR077175MA).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectBrazilen_US
dc.subjectTeen child-bearingen_US
dc.subjectMental morbidityen_US
dc.subjectStigmaen_US
dc.subjectLife-cycleen_US
dc.subjectEthnographyen_US
dc.titleTaming troubled teens: The social production of mental morbidity amongst young mothers in Pelotas, Brazilen_US
dc.typeResearch Paperen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.10.014-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff/School of Social Sciences-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff/School of Social Sciences/Anthropology-
Appears in Collections:Anthropology
Publications
Dept of Social Sciences Media and Communications Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf130.34 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.