Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Information systems evaluation: Navigating through the problem domain|
|Keywords:||Investment justification;Evaluation;IT/IS;Case study|
|Citation:||Information and Management. 40(1): 11-24|
|Abstract:||Information systems (IS) make it possible to improve organizational efficiency and effectiveness, which can provide competitive advantage. There is, however, a great deal of difficulty reported in the normative literature when it comes to the evaluation of investments in IS, with companies often finding themselves unable to assess the full implications of their IS infrastructure. Although many of the savings resulting from IS are considered suitable for inclusion within traditional accountancy frameworks, it is the intangible and non-financial benefits, together with indirect project costs that complicate the justification process. In exploring this phenomenon, the paper reviews the normative literature in the area of IS evaluation, and then proposes a set of conjectures. These were tested within a case study to analyze the investment justification process of a manufacturing IS investment. The idiosyncrasies of the case study and problems experienced during its attempts to evaluate, implement, and realize the holistic implications of the IS investment are presented and critically analyzed. The paper concludes by identifying lessons learnt and thus, proposes a number of empirical findings for consideration by decisionmakers during the investment evaluation process.|
|Appears in Collections:||Business and Management|
Brunel Business School Research Papers
Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.