Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://buratest.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/4214
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHubble, N-
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-26T12:20:00Z-
dc.date.available2010-03-26T12:20:00Z-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Postcolonial Writing. 40(1): 29-41en
dc.identifier.issn1744-9855-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/4214-
dc.description.abstractGeorge Orwell, anticipating many of the arguments made by Benedict Anderson in the “Patriotism and Racism” chapter of Imagined Communities, illuminated patriotism and nationalism as shifting aspects of a wider dialectical interplay between an identification with imagined communities and a loyalty to humanity. Orwell's essay “Inside the Whale” can be seen, contrary to Salman Rushdie's criticism that it advocates quietism, as an essay about imaginary homelands. In this reading the whale is a metaphor for a dialectical space created by a writer in order to gain purchase on the unceasing dialectic of history. Analysis of The Lion and the Unicorn in this article links Orwell's work with that of Anderson and Rushdie by exploring in his vision of a classless England the relationship between the personal imaginary homeland and the political imagined community.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen
dc.subjectClassen
dc.subjectLiteratureen
dc.subjectNationalismen
dc.subjectPatriotismen
dc.subjectTropical Gothicen
dc.titleImagined and imaginary whales: Benedict Anderson, Salman Rushdie and George Orwellen
dc.typeResearch Paperen
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17449850208589373-
Appears in Collections:English and Creative Writing
Dept of Arts and Humanities Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf114.5 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.