Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://buratest.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/3516
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCampos, NF-
dc.contributor.authorKaranasos, MG-
dc.coverage.spatial9en
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-23T09:41:34Z-
dc.date.available2009-07-23T09:41:34Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.citationEconomics and Finance Discussion Papers, Brunel University, 07-26.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/3516-
dc.description.abstractWhat is the relationship between economic growth and its volatility? Does political instability affect growth directly or indirectly, through volatility? This paper tries to answer such questions using a power-ARCH framework with annual time series data for Argentina from 1896 to 2000. We show that while assassinations and strikes (what we call “informal” political instability) have a direct negative effect on economic growth, “formal” political instability (constitutional and legislative changes) has an indirect (through volatility) negative impact. We also find preliminary support for the idea that while the effects of “formal” instability are stronger in the long-run, those of “informal” instability are stronger in the short-run.en
dc.format.extent190989 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBrunel Universityen
dc.subjecteconomic growth; volatility; political instability; power-ARCHen
dc.titleGrowth, volatility and political instability: Non-linear time-series evidence for Argentina, 1896-2000en
dc.typeResearch Paperen
Appears in Collections:Economics and Finance
Dept of Economics and Finance Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
0726.pdf186.51 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.