Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://buratest.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/3514
Title: Reputational concerns in arbitration: Decision bias and information acquisition
Authors: Iossa, E
Keywords: arbitration; confidentiality; decision making; experts; information acquisition; reputational concerns
Issue Date: 2007
Publisher: Brunel University
Citation: Economics and Finance Discussion Papers, Brunel University, 07-28.
Abstract: We analyze how reputational concerns of arbitrators affect the quality of their decision process, in particular, information acquisition and bias. We assume that arbitrators differ in their ability to observe the state of the world and that information acquisition is costly and unobservable. We show that reputational concerns increase incentives for information acquisition but may induce arbitrators to bias their decisions towards one party in the dispute. This decision bias is greater when the dispute proceedings are confidential rather than public. Building on these results, we study the circumstances under which the parties to a contract choose to employ arbitration rather than litigation in court to resolve their disputes.
URI: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/3514
Appears in Collections:Economics and Finance
Dept of Economics and Finance Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
0728.pdf231.79 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.