Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://buratest.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/2543
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMushkat, M-
dc.contributor.authorMushkat, R-
dc.coverage.spatial10en
dc.date.accessioned2008-07-25T13:07:59Z-
dc.date.available2008-07-25T13:07:59Z-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Applied Philosophy. 19, 63-72en
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/2543-
dc.description.abstractPeople obtain value, or gain utility, from procedures rather than merely from outcomes. Academic researchers are slowly and selectively coming to terms with this fact, but it is neither sufficiently nor widely appreciated by actors in Hong Kong's political arena, whether at the center or on the periphery. The territory is grappling with the issue of democratic reform— both its pace and scope— but the heated exchanges between the proponents and the opponents of representative government are confined to the outcome utility of the various constitutional proposals. It is essential to incorporate the procedural element into this incomplete picture.en
dc.format.extent817799 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherPhilosophy Documentation Centeren
dc.titleThe political economy of recasting the constitutional debate in Hong Kongen
dc.typeResearch Paperen
Appears in Collections:Law
Dept of Politics, History and Law Research Papers



Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.