Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://buratest.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1994
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKaganas, F-
dc.contributor.authorPiper, CD-
dc.coverage.spatial15en
dc.date.accessioned2008-04-11T11:44:07Z-
dc.date.available2008-04-11T11:44:07Z-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.citationFamily Law. 14 (4) 365-379en
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1994-
dc.description.abstractIn the context of increased litigation over contact, this article examines the debate around proposals for a presumption of ‘shared parenting’. It concludes that such a presumption would not achieve the aims of its proponents. Its introduction would also be fraught with practical and doctrinal problems.en
dc.format.extent228207 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherJordansen
dc.relation.ispartofChild and Family Law Quarterly;-
dc.subjectFamily lawen
dc.subjectResidence ordersen
dc.subjectSeparated parentsen
dc.titleShared parenting: A 70% solution?en
dc.typeResearch Paperen
Appears in Collections:Law
Dept of Politics, History and Law Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Shared [2002]CFLQ365.pdf222.86 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.