Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://buratest.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/14811
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJames, CA-
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, AJ-
dc.contributor.authorWillmott, AGB-
dc.contributor.authorWatt, PW-
dc.contributor.authorGibson, OR-
dc.contributor.authorMaxwell, NS-
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-21T14:34:14Z-
dc.date.available2017-05-
dc.date.available2017-06-21T14:34:14Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2017, pp. 1 - 1en_US
dc.identifier.issn1064-8011-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/14811-
dc.description.abstractFollowing heat acclimation (HA), endurance running performance remains impaired in hot vs temperate conditions. Combining HA with precooling demonstrates no additive benefit in intermittent sprint, or continuous cycling exercise protocols, during which heat strain may be less severe compared to endurance running. This study investigated the effect of short-term heat acclimation (STHA) combined with mixed-methods precooling, on endurance running performance and directly compared precooling and HA. Nine amateur trained runners completed 5 km treadmill time trials in the heat (32°C, 60% RH) under four conditions; no intervention (CON), precooling (PC), short-term heat acclimation (5 days - HA) and short-term heat acclimation with precooling (HA+PC). Mean (±SD) performance times were; CON 1476 (173) s, PC 1421 (146) s, HA 1378 (116) s and HA+PC 1373 (121) s. This equated to the following improvements versus CON; PC -3.7%, HA -6.6% and HA+PC -7.0%. Statistical differences were only observed between HA and CON (p=0.004, d=0.68, 95% CI [-0.27, 1.63]) however, similar effect sizes were observed for HA+PC vs CON (d=0.70, 95% CI [-0.25, 1.65]), with smaller effects between PC vs CON (d=0.34, 95% CI [-0.59, 1.27]), HA vs PC (d=0.33, 95% CI [-0.60, 1.26]) and HA+PC vs PC (d=0.36, 95% CI [-0.57, 1.29]). Pilot testing revealed a time trial typical error of 16 s (1.2%). Precooling offered no further benefit to performance in the acclimated individual, despite modest alleviation of physiological strain. Maintenance of running speed in HA+PC, despite reduced physiological strain, may indicate an inappropriate pacing strategy therefore, further familiarisation is recommended to optimise a combined strategy. Finally, these data indicate HA, achieved through cycle training, yields a larger ergogenic effect than precooling on 5km running performance in the heat, although precooling remains beneficial when HA is not possible.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 1-
dc.languageen-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectHyperthermia;en_US
dc.subjectendurance;en_US
dc.subjectlactate thresholden_US
dc.subjectV̇O2max;en_US
dc.subjectheat stressen_US
dc.subjectthermoregulationen_US
dc.titleShort-term heat acclimation and precooling, independently and combined, improve 5 km running performance in the heaten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001979-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Publications
Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Heat acclimate precool or do both... Accepted.docx235.79 kBUnknownView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.