Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://buratest.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/12395
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWillmott, AGB-
dc.contributor.authorGibson, OR-
dc.contributor.authorHayes, M-
dc.contributor.authorMaxwell, NS-
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-22T16:54:09Z-
dc.date.available2016-02-01-
dc.date.available2016-03-22T16:54:09Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Thermal Biology, 56: pp. 59 - 67, (2016)en_US
dc.identifier.issn0306-4565-
dc.identifier.issn1879-0992-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306456515301406-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/12395-
dc.description.abstractEndurance performances are impaired under conditions of elevated heat stress. Short term heat acclimation (STHA) over 4-6 days can evoke rapid adaptation, which mitigate decrements in performance and alleviate heat strain. This study investigated the efficacy of twice daily heat acclimation (TDHA) compared to single session per day heat acclimation (SDHA) and normothermic training, at inducing heat acclimation phenotype and its impact upon running performance in hot, humid conditions.Twenty one, moderately trained males were matched and assigned to three groups; SDHA (mean±SD) (peak oxygen consumption [V˙O2peak] 45.8±6.1 mL kg-1 min-1, body mass 81.3±16.0 kg, stature 182±3 cm), TDHA (46.1±7.0 mL kg-1 min-1, 80.1±11.9 kg, 178±4 cm) or control (CON) (47.1±3.5 mL kg-1 min-1, 78.6±16.7 kg, 178±4 cm). Interventions consisted of 45 min cycling at 50% V˙O2peak, once daily for 4d (SDHA) and twice daily for 2d (TDHA), in 35 °C, 60% relative humidity (RH), and once daily for 4 days (CON) in 21 °C, 40% RH. Participants completed a pre- and post-intervention 5 km treadmill run trial in 30 °C, 60% RH, where the first 2 km were fixed at 40% V˙O2peak and the final 3 km was self-paced.No statistically significant interaction effects occurred within- or between-groups over the 2-4 days intervention. While within-group differences were found in physiological and perceptual measures during the fixed intensity trial post-intervention, they did not statistically differ between-groups. Similarly, TDHA (-36±34 s [+3.5%]) and SDHA (-26±28 s [+2.8%]) groups improved 3 km performances (p=0.35), but did not differ from CON (-6±44 s [+0.6%]).This is the first study to investigate the effects of HA twice daily and compare it with traditional single session per day STHA. These STHA protocols may have the ability to induce partial adaptive responses to heat stress and possibly enhance performance in environmentally challenging conditions, however, future development is warranted to optimise the administration to provide a potent stimuli for heat adaptation in athletic and military personnel within a rapid regime.en_US
dc.format.extent59 - 67-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectHeat acclimationen_US
dc.subjectShort term heat acclimationen_US
dc.subjectHeat stressen_US
dc.subjectTwice dailyen_US
dc.subjectThermoregulationen_US
dc.subjectAthleticsen_US
dc.subjectMilitaryen_US
dc.titleThe effects of single versus twice daily short term heat acclimation on heat strain and 3000 m running performance in hot, humid conditionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2016.01.001-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Thermal Biology-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume56-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf1.19 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.