Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Public participation and public services in British liberal democracy: Colin Ward's anarchist critique|
|Keywords:||Public participation;Public services;Colin ward;Self help;Mutual aid;Friendly socities|
|Citation:||Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33 (6): pp. 1325 - 1343, (2015)|
|Abstract:||The aim of this article is to set out a critique of the prevailing academic and government accounts of ‘public participation’. This critique is drawn from the work of the British anarchist Colin Ward, which we argue is significant because it provides an alternative to state- or market-led models of public participation. Both of the latter models subject individuals to external forms of authority (state or market). By contrast, Ward reminds us that the working class tradition of free and autonomous associations, illustrated notably by the friendly societies, established a different understanding of public participation, one which pre-supposes the actual running and maintaining of the very services that the public relied upon through the key values of mutual aid and self-help. We describe the nature of these associations and suggest that, historically, they have been the most accomplished alternatives to state- and market-led approaches to public participation.|
|Appears in Collections:||Dept of Social Sciences Media and Communications Research Papers|
Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.