Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://buratest.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/11744
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCroft, J-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T13:24:59Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-07-
dc.date.available2015-12-10T13:24:59Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationTempo: a quarterly review of modern music, 70 (275): pp. 71 - 77, (2015)en_US
dc.identifier.issnhttp://johncroft.eu/-
dc.identifier.issn1478-2286-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/11744-
dc.description© Copyright Cambridge University Press 2015-
dc.description.abstractThis reply addresses a number of misunderstandings that have arisen with regard to my argument in ‘Composition is not Research’; notably that it rests on a definition of research derived from ‘scientific method’, and that it somehow entails the view that composers should not be asked to write about their music. It is argued here that referring to composition as ‘research’ is at best a perverse (if institutionally expedient) way of talking about what composers have always done, and at worst leads to a distorted picture of compositional work and musical value.en_US
dc.format.extent71 - 77 (7)-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP): HSS Journalsen_US
dc.titleComposing, Researching and Ways of Talkingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0040298215000649-
dc.relation.isPartOfTempo (London, 1939): a quarterly review of modern music-
pubs.issue275-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume70-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Arts and Humanities Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf116.63 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.