Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://buratest.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1142
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBhaumik, SK-
dc.contributor.authorEstrin, S-
dc.coverage.spatial36en
dc.date.accessioned2007-08-09T10:52:18Z-
dc.date.available2007-08-09T10:52:18Z-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Development Economics, 82(2): 374-392, 2007en
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1142-
dc.description.abstractWe use enterprise data to analyse and contrast the determinants of enterprise performance in China and Russia. We find that in China, enterprise growth and efficiency is associated with rapid increases in factor inputs, but not correlated with ownership or institutional factors. However, in Russia, enterprise growth is not associated with increases in factor quantity (except for labor) or quality. The main determinants of company performance are instead demand and institutional factors at a regional level. We explore possible interpretations of these results, including the impact of institutional and managerial quality.en
dc.format.extent302419 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherElsevier Science B.V., Amsterdamen
dc.subjectEnterprise performanceen
dc.subjectPrivatization in Russia and China-
dc.titleHow transition paths differ: enterprise performance in Russia and Chinaen
dc.typeResearch Paperen
Appears in Collections:Economics and Finance
Dept of Economics and Finance Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
iza_dp1484.pdf295.33 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.