Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://buratest.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10861
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSharpe, RM-
dc.contributor.authorTurner, KJ-
dc.contributor.authorSumpter, JP-
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-14T11:06:48Z-
dc.date.available1998-05-
dc.date.available2015-05-14T11:06:48Z-
dc.date.issued1998-
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Health Perspectives, 1998, 106 (5), pp. A220 - A221en_US
dc.identifier.issn0091-6765-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10861-
dc.description.abstractThere is currently much debate as to which in vivo tests should be selected for the detection of adverse effects of endocrine disruptors in test animals. As co-authors of a much-cited article in Environmental Health Perspectives. which described small (but significant) decreases in testicular weight of adult rats that had been exposed developmentally to either of two environmental estrogens, we would like to bring certain of our experiences to the attention of readers of EHP and to those involved in framing and implementing regulatory guidelines in this area.en_US
dc.format.extentA220 - A221-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectEndocrine Disruptorsen_US
dc.subjectEnviroment Estrogensen_US
dc.titleEndocrine disruptors and testis developmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfEnvironmental Health Perspectives-
pubs.issue5-
pubs.issue5-
pubs.volume106-
pubs.volume106-
Appears in Collections:Environment

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf740.09 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.