Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPalsson, G-
dc.contributor.authorPrainsack, B-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of the Commons, 2011, 5 (2), pp. 259 - 283en_US
dc.description.abstractEmphasizing the context of what has often been referred to as “scarce natural resources”, in particular forests, meadows, and fishing stocks, Elinor Ostrom’s important work Governing the commons (1990) presents an institutional framework for discussing the development and use of collective action with respect to environmental problems. In this article we discuss extensions of Ostrom’s approach to genes and genomes and explore its limits and usefulness. With the new genetics, we suggest, the biological gaze has not only been turned inward to the management and mining of the human body, also the very notion of the “biological” has been destabilized. This shift and destabilization, we argue, which is the result of human refashioning and appropriation of “life itself”, raises important questions about the relevance and applicability of Ostrom’s institutional framework in the context of what we call “genomic stuff”, genomic material, data, and information.en_US
dc.format.extent259 - 283-
dc.publisherResearch Today Publicationsen_US
dc.subjectScarce Natural Resourcesen_US
dc.titleGenomic stuff: Governing the (im)matter of lifeen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfInternational Journal of the Commons-
Appears in Collections:Environment

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf166.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.