Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://buratest.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10549
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGaines, SO-
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-13T11:36:34Z-
dc.date.available2014-
dc.date.available2015-04-13T11:36:34Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationPsychology of Well-Being, 2014, 4 (16)en_US
dc.identifier.issn2211-1522-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10549-
dc.descriptionThis article has been made available through the Brunel Open Access Publishing Fund.-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Results of a recently published paper from members of the Wellbeing and Poverty Pathways Project team indicated that a seven-domain, intercorrelated-factor model of economic confidence, agency/participation, social connections, close relationships, physical/mental health, competence/self-worth, and values/meaning as dimensions of inner wellbeing yielded optimal goodness-of-fit (compared to a single-factor model) among a large sample of individuals in rural India. The goal of the present study was to determine whether this model also provided optimal goodness-of-fit among a similarly large sample of individuals in rural Zambia. Findings: A 35-item survey measuring each of the seven domains of inner wellbeing (5 items per domain) was administered to 344 individuals (140 men, 204 women). Results of confirmatory factor analyses indicated that the seven-factor intercorrelated model not only was acceptable in itself but also yielded significantly better goodness-of-fit than did a one-factor model. Furthermore, 34 of the 35 items loaded significantly and positively on their hypothesised factors. Conclusions: Overall, results from the present paper – combined with results from the recently published paper by members of the Wellbeing and Poverty Pathways Project team – indicate that the seven-factor intercorrelated model can be generalised across India and Zambia. Implications for studies of wellbeing within (as well as outside) developing nations are discussed.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.subjectConfirmatory factor analysisen_US
dc.subjectZambiaen_US
dc.subjectInner wellbeingen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the inner wellbeing model in Zambiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx/doi.org/10.1186/s13612-014-0016-5-
dc.relation.isPartOfPsychology of Well-Being-
dc.relation.isPartOfPsychology of Well-Being-
pubs.issue16-
pubs.issue16-
pubs.volume4-
pubs.volume4-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Staff by College/Department/Division-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Staff by College/Department/Division/College of Health and Life Sciences-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Staff by College/Department/Division/College of Health and Life Sciences/Dept of Life Sciences-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Staff by College/Department/Division/College of Health and Life Sciences/Dept of Life Sciences/Psychology-
Appears in Collections:Brunel OA Publishing Fund
Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf108.56 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.