Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://buratest.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8086
Title: Derrida and the end of the world
Authors: Gaston, S
Keywords: Derrida;Husserl;Philosophy;Literature
Issue Date: 2011
Publisher: Johns Hopkins University Press
Citation: New Literary History, 42(3), 499 - 517, 2011
Abstract: Derrida was very attentive to the fictions that arise from claiming to open or to close a world, most notably in his readings of Kant, Hegel, Heidegger, and Nancy. At the same time, he retained a concept—or a difference¬¬—of world. From his earliest work on Husserl, Derrida relies on a framework that takes its vantage point from what is not only in the world but also of the world, or as Fink puts, at the origin of the world. Derrida uses the difference of world—its origin and end—to register the other as other. In his later work, on an individual death as the end of the world, the difference of world delineates death as other. Like Husserl and Heidegger before him, Derrida needs a concept of world. Do we still need a concept of world?
URI: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/new_literary_history/v042/42.3.gaston.html
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8086
DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2011.0031
ISSN: 0028-6087
Appears in Collections:English and Creative Writing
Publications
Dept of Arts and Humanities Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf342.06 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.