Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://buratest.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8046
Title: A systematic review of integrated working between care homes and health care services
Authors: Davies, S
Goodman, C
Bunn, F
Victor, CR
Dickinson, A
Iliffe, S
Gage, H
Martin, W
Froggatt, K
Keywords: National Health Service;Care homes;Health care services
Issue Date: 2011
Publisher: BioMed Central
Citation: BMC Health Services Research, 11(320), 2011
Abstract: Background In the UK there are almost three times as many beds in care homes as in National Health Service (NHS) hospitals. Care homes rely on primary health care for access to medical care and specialist services. Repeated policy documents and government reviews register concern about how health care works with independent providers, and the need to increase the equity, continuity and quality of medical care for care homes. Despite multiple initiatives, it is not known if some approaches to service delivery are more effective in promoting integrated working between the NHS and care homes. This study aims to evaluate the different integrated approaches to health care services supporting older people in care homes, and identify barriers and facilitators to integrated working. Methods A systematic review was conducted using Medline (PubMed), CINAHL, BNI, EMBASE, PsycInfo, DH Data, Kings Fund, Web of Science (WoS incl. SCI, SSCI, HCI) and the Cochrane Library incl. DARE. Studies were included if they evaluated the effectiveness of integrated working between primary health care professionals and care homes, or identified barriers and facilitators to integrated working. Studies were quality assessed; data was extracted on health, service use, cost and process related outcomes. A modified narrative synthesis approach was used to compare and contrast integration using the principles of framework analysis. Results Seventeen studies were included; 10 quantitative studies, two process evaluations, one mixed methods study and four qualitative. The majority were carried out in nursing homes. They were characterised by heterogeneity of topic, interventions, methodology and outcomes. Most quantitative studies reported limited effects of the intervention; there was insufficient information to evaluate cost. Facilitators to integrated working included care home managers' support and protected time for staff training. Studies with the potential for integrated working were longer in duration. Conclusions Despite evidence about what inhibits and facilitates integrated working there was limited evidence about what the outcomes of different approaches to integrated care between health service and care homes might be. The majority of studies only achieved integrated working at the patient level of care and the focus on health service defined problems and outcome measures did not incorporate the priorities of residents or acknowledge the skills of care home staff. There is a need for more research to understand how integrated working is achieved and to test the effect of different approaches on cost, staff satisfaction and resident outcomes.
Description: © 2011 Davies et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd
URI: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/320
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8046
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-320
ISSN: 1472-6963
Appears in Collections:Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf290.53 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.