Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://buratest.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/11744
Title: Composing, Researching and Ways of Talking
Authors: Croft, J
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP): HSS Journals
Citation: Tempo: a quarterly review of modern music, 70 (275): pp. 71 - 77, (2015)
Abstract: This reply addresses a number of misunderstandings that have arisen with regard to my argument in ‘Composition is not Research’; notably that it rests on a definition of research derived from ‘scientific method’, and that it somehow entails the view that composers should not be asked to write about their music. It is argued here that referring to composition as ‘research’ is at best a perverse (if institutionally expedient) way of talking about what composers have always done, and at worst leads to a distorted picture of compositional work and musical value.
Description: © Copyright Cambridge University Press 2015
URI: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/11744
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0040298215000649
ISSN: http://johncroft.eu/
1478-2286
Appears in Collections:Dept of Arts and Humanities Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf116.63 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.