Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://buratest.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/11284
Title: Mapping Functions in Health-Related Quality of Life: Mapping From Two Cancer-Specific Health-Related Quality-of-Life Instruments to EQ-5D-3L.
Authors: Young, TA
Mukuria, C
Rowen, D
Brazier, JE
Longworth, L
Keywords: EORTC-QLQ-C30;EQ-5D-3L;FACT-G;Cancer;Health-related quality of life;Mapping functions
Issue Date: 2015
Citation: Medical Decision Making, 2015
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Clinical trials in cancer frequently include cancer-specific measures of health but not preference-based measures such as the EQ-5D that are suitable for economic evaluation. Mapping functions have been developed to predict EQ-5D values from these measures, but there is considerable uncertainty about the most appropriate model to use, and many existing models are poor at predicting EQ-5D values. This study aims to investigate a range of potential models to develop mapping functions from 2 widely used cancer-specific measures (FACT-G and EORTC-QLQ-C30) and to identify the best model. METHODS: Mapping models are fitted to predict EQ-5D-3L values using ordinary least squares (OLS), tobit, 2-part models, splining, and to EQ-5D item-level responses using response mapping from the FACT-G and QLQ-C30. A variety of model specifications are estimated. Model performance and predictive ability are compared. Analysis is based on 530 patients with various cancers for the FACT-G and 771 patients with multiple myeloma, breast cancer, and lung cancer for the QLQ-C30. RESULTS: For FACT-G, OLS models most accurately predict mean EQ-5D values with the best predicting model using FACT-G items with similar results using tobit. Response mapping has low predictive ability. In contrast, for the QLQ-C30, response mapping has the most accurate predictions using QLQ-C30 dimensions. The QLQ-C30 has better predicted EQ-5D values across the range of possible values; however, few respondents in the FACT-G data set have low EQ-5D values, which reduces the accuracy at the severe end. CONCLUSIONS: OLS and tobit mapping functions perform well for both instruments. Response mapping gives the best model predictions for QLQ-C30. The generalizability of the FACT-G mapping function is limited to populations in moderate to good health.
URI: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25997920
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/11284
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X15587497
ISSN: 0272989X15587497
1552-681X
Appears in Collections:Health Economics Research Group (HERG)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf866.44 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.