Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://buratest.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10992
Title: An analysis of the biomechanics of interference screw fixation and sheathed devices for biceps tenodesis
Authors: Saithna, A
Chizari, M
Morris, G
Anley, C
Wang, B
Snow, M
Keywords: Biceps tenodesis;Biomechanics;Interference screw;Sheathed device
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: Elsevier Ltd
Citation: Clinical Biomechanics, 30(6): 551 - 557, (July 2015)
Abstract: Background This study aimed to evaluate the differences in biomechanical properties of biceps tenodesis when performed with sheathed versus unsheathed screws and also to investigate the effect of altering the pre-tension. Methods Tenodesis was performed in an in vitro model using biomechanical test blocks and ovine tendons. Blocks were allocated to 1 of 5 groups which varied by method of tenodesis and cyclical loading protocol: Group A, Biosure PK screw (10-100 N), Group B: 7-8 mm Biosure Sync and Biosure PK screw (10-100 N), Group C: Biosure PK screw (10-70 N), Group D: Biosure PK (20-100 N), and Group E: custom sheath and Biosure PK screw (10-100 N). If tenodeses remained intact after 500 cycles maximum load to failure testing was performed. Findings 30% of tenodeses in Group A failed prior to 500 cycles whereas none failed in the sheathed device groups (P = 0.02). Using a sheathed device prevented mal-rotation. However, tenodeses in Group B were more likely to fail immediately distal to the tenodesis at a load below the anticipated maximum load to failure suggesting tendon damage during fixation. Using the custom sheath, which did not have sharp edges, resulted in a statistically significant increased maximum load to failure in Group E (348 N) when compared to Group A (228 N, mean difference 120 N, P = 0.01) and Group B (253 N, mean difference 95 N, P = 0.0007). Interpretation Sheathed devices prevent mal-rotation and increase stiffness and maximum load to failure. This is further improved by reducing tendon damage at the time of tenodesis.
URI: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003315001138#
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10992
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.04.006
ISSN: 0268-0033
1879-1271
Appears in Collections:Dept of Mechanical Aerospace and Civil Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf618.33 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.