Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Group selection theories are now more sophisticated, but are they more predictive?|
|Keywords:||Human cooperation;Large groups;Genetically unrelated individuals|
|Publisher:||Ian Pitchford and Robert M. Young|
|Citation:||Evolutionary Psychology, 10 (1): 45 - 49, (2012)|
|Abstract:||Human beings are unique among species in their ability to cooperate in large groups of genetically unrelated individuals, and in this book, Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis attempt to account for the origins of this ability. The authors specialize in the use of formal models and agent-based simulations in order to precisely specify their theories of cooperation, and they often draw on studies conducted in hunter gatherer societies and in experimental economic laboratories for evidence that they find relevant to evaluating these theories. The book is a valuable review of these anthropological and economic literatures, and a thorough showcase of the authors’ expert formal theorizing about how cooperation may have evolved. However, I often found myself disagreeing with the authors’ focus on group selection as an explanation for human cooperation, and with their views on how well the empirical findings provide support for group selectionist theories.|
|Appears in Collections:||Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers|
Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.